top of page
  • hammaad saghir

Government Halts Plans for Envisaged Hydrogen Levy Targeting Homeowners





In a pivotal legislative shift, today's amendments to the forthcoming Energy Bill have left the original concept of a hydrogen levy for household energy bills by the wayside. This actual levy aimed to bolster the development of low-carbon hydrogen facilities. However, it's out with the old and in with the new—a freshly minted levy targeting the gas shipping sector.


The original scheme had intended to charge domestic energy bills starting in 2025 to subsidize contracts with hydrogen producers. The overarching goal? To fuel the birth of low-carbon hydrogen infrastructure. Yet, the proposal had been met with a discordant chorus from backbench MPs and social activists—the concern: piling on financial burdens upon already stratospheric household energy expenses.


Cue think tank Onward's earlier analysis threw a number into the whirlpool of debate: an average of £118 per household by 2030 to reach the government's lofty aim of a 10GW low-carbon hydrogen production capacity by decade's end.


Energy Security and Net Zero Secretary Grant Shapps echoed sentiments of dissent. His position: Households shouldn't bear the brunt of fiscal strain for hydrogen projects. The funds, Shapps contended, must come from "further up the chain."


Today's amendments effectively table the household levy, pivoting to a levy squarely aimed at the gas shipping industry. The Department of Energy Security and Net Zero was quick to comment. "This overhaul signifies more than a mere policy adjustment; it's a commitment to fairness," said a department spokesperson. "This new levy thrust targets those most poised to gain from hydrogen proliferation, with forecasts indicating north of 12,000 new jobs by 2030."


Still on the horizon is a government consultation on this freshly minted financial blueprint.


While the news has been largely applauded, the shadow of concern lingers. The query? Whether the additional levies imposed upon gas shippers will eventually percolate down to everyday consumers. But the government pushes back, contending that sectors most likely to reap early benefits from hydrogen tech deployment should appropriately bear this cost.


The intrigue extends beyond mere policy and economics; it cuts to the heart of the UK's sustainability strategy. A burgeoning portfolio of green and blue hydrogen initiatives has been gaining momentum, fueling hopes and scepticism about the trajectory of the government's net-zero ambitions.


Jack Richardson from the think tank Onward encapsulated the reformist zeal: "Axing the household levy is not just fiscal prudence; it's political foresight to keep the public bought into net-zero ambitions."


Finally, Jo Gideon, MP for Stoke-on-Trent Central, shared her relief, "The cost of green energy transition, while imperative, shouldn't weigh on the domestic front. This newly-forged compromise is a step in the right direction—it aligns the planets of environmental responsibility, job creation, and consumer affordability."

Commenti


bottom of page